1958 Austin Princess vs. 2008 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2008 Holden Commodore is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 121 more horse power than 1958 Austin Princess. (119 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin Princess.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Austin Princess (251 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 1958 Austin Princess will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Austin Princess | 2008 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Austin | Holden |
| Model | Princess | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
