1958 BMW 502 vs. 1969 Ford GT 40
To start off, 1969 Ford GT 40 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 BMW 502 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 249 more horse power than 1958 BMW 502. (101 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1958 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 BMW 502 weights approximately 450 kg more than 1969 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 BMW 502 | 1969 Ford GT 40 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 502 | GT 40 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2420 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 125 L |