1958 BMW 502 vs. 1998 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 BMW 502 (101 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1998 Chevrolet Tracker. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 BMW 502 should accelerate faster than 1998 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 BMW 502 weights approximately 180 kg more than 1998 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 BMW 502. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 BMW 502 | 1998 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 502 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1958 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2210 mm |