1958 BMW 502 vs. 2000 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2000 Ford Econoline is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 BMW 502 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1958 BMW 502. (101 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1958 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 915 kg more than 1958 BMW 502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 BMW 502 | 2000 Ford Econoline | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 502 | Econoline |
Year Released | 1958 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3510 mm |