1958 BMW 502 vs. 2006 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 BMW 502 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (340 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1958 BMW 502. (101 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1958 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Charger weights approximately 933 kg more than 1958 BMW 502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Dodge Charger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 BMW 502. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 BMW 502 | 2006 Dodge Charger | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | 502 | Charger |
Year Released | 1958 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 340 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 2343 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 72 L |