1958 BMW 502 vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1958 BMW 502. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1958 BMW 502.
Because 1958 BMW 502 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 BMW 502. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1958 BMW 502 has manual transmission. 1958 BMW 502 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1958 BMW 502 | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 502 | Epica |
Year Released | 1958 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2700 mm |