1958 BMW Isetta vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1982 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 BMW Isetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 BMW Isetta would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (70 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1958 BMW Isetta. (13 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1958 BMW Isetta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 505 kg more than 1958 BMW Isetta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 BMW Isetta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 BMW Isetta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 BMW Isetta | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | BMW | Nissan |
| Model | Isetta | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 247 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 1 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | single | in-line |
| Horse Power | 13 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 360 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2300 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 2420 mm |
