1958 BMW Isetta vs. 2000 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2000 Smart ForTwo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 BMW Isetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 BMW Isetta would be higher. At 698 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Smart ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Smart ForTwo (60 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1958 BMW Isetta. (13 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1958 BMW Isetta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Smart ForTwo weights approximately 455 kg more than 1958 BMW Isetta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 BMW Isetta | 2000 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | BMW | Smart |
| Model | Isetta | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
| Engine Size | 247 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 1 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | single | in-line |
| Horse Power | 13 HP | 60 HP |
| Top Speed | 85 km/hour | 135 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 1 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 360 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2300 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 1820 mm |
