1958 BMW Isetta vs. 2006 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac BLS is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 BMW Isetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 BMW Isetta would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac BLS (149 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1958 BMW Isetta. (13 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1958 BMW Isetta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 1100 kg more than 1958 BMW Isetta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 BMW Isetta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 BMW Isetta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 BMW Isetta | 2006 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | Isetta | BLS |
Year Released | 1958 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 247 cc | 1910 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 1 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | single | in-line |
Horse Power | 13 HP | 149 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 85 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 1 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 360 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2300 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 2680 mm |