1958 Bristol 405 vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Bristol 405. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Bristol 405 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Cooper weights approximately 23 kg more than 1958 Bristol 405.
Because 1958 Bristol 405 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Bristol 405. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Cooper (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Bristol 405. (152 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Cooper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Bristol 405.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Bristol 405 | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
| Make | Bristol | Mini |
| Model | 405 | Cooper |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 152 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 1265 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1426 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2547 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 50 L |
