1958 Bristol 406 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Bristol 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Bristol 406 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1958 Bristol 406. (130 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1958 Bristol 406. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 955 kg more than 1958 Bristol 406. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Bristol 406 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | 406 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2216 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 79 L |
