1958 Bristol 406 vs. 1982 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1982 Ford Falcon is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Bristol 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Bristol 406 would be higher. At 3,271 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Bristol 406 (130 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1982 Ford Falcon. (109 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Bristol 406 should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Falcon weights approximately 250 kg more than 1958 Bristol 406.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Falcon (228 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Bristol 406. (180 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Bristol 406.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Bristol 406 | 1982 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | 406 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1958 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2216 cc | 3271 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2830 mm |