1958 Bristol 406 vs. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Bristol 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Bristol 406 would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Bristol 406 (130 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Bristol 406 should accelerate faster than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 30 kg more than 1958 Bristol 406.
Because 1958 Bristol 406 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Bristol 406. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Bristol 406 | 1983 Cadillac Cimarron | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | 406 | Cimarron |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2216 cc | 2843 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2580 mm |
