1958 Bristol 406 vs. 2000 Marcos Mantis
To start off, 2000 Marcos Mantis is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Bristol 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Bristol 406 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Marcos Mantis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Marcos Mantis (506 HP) has 376 more horse power than 1958 Bristol 406. (130 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Marcos Mantis should accelerate faster than 1958 Bristol 406.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Marcos Mantis (613 Nm) has 433 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Bristol 406. (180 Nm). This means 2000 Marcos Mantis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Bristol 406.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Bristol 406 | 2000 Marcos Mantis | |
| Make | Bristol | Marcos |
| Model | 406 | Mantis |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2216 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 506 HP |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 613 Nm |
| Top Speed | 209 km/hour | 283 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1020 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2290 mm |
