1958 Bristol 406 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Bristol 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Bristol 406 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1958 Bristol 406. (130 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1958 Bristol 406. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 180 kg more than 1958 Bristol 406. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Bristol 406. (180 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Bristol 406.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Bristol 406 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
Model | 406 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2216 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 68.7 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.6 mm | 75 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 61 L |