1958 Bristol 406 vs. 2004 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Toyota Celica is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Bristol 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Bristol 406 would be higher. At 2,216 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Bristol 406 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Celica (140 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1958 Bristol 406. (130 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1958 Bristol 406. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Bristol 406 weights approximately 16 kg more than 2004 Toyota Celica.
Because 1958 Bristol 406 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Bristol 406. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Bristol 406 (180 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota Celica. (170 Nm). This means 1958 Bristol 406 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Bristol 406 | 2004 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Bristol | Toyota |
| Model | 406 | Celica |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2216 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 68.7 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 99.6 mm | 91 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1104 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 55 L |
