1958 Bristol 406 vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Bristol 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Bristol 406 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 112 more horse power than 1958 Bristol 406. (130 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1958 Bristol 406.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Bristol 406. (180 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Bristol 406.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Bristol 406 | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Bristol | Holden |
Model | 406 | UTE |
Year Released | 1958 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2216 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 180 Nm | 330 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |