1958 Bristol 406 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Bristol 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Bristol 406 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1958 Bristol 406. (130 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1958 Bristol 406.
Because 1958 Bristol 406 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Bristol 406. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Bristol 406. (180 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Bristol 406.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Bristol 406 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | 406 | E-350 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2216 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 57 L |