1958 Buick 40 vs. 1984 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1984 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,971 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Buick 40 weights approximately 945 kg more than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1958 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Buick 40 | 1984 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Buick | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 40 | Colt |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5971 cc | 1439 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 895 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2390 mm |
