1958 Buick 40 vs. 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,971 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Buick 40 weights approximately 275 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Because 1958 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Buick 40 | 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | |
Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
Model | 40 | Monte Carlo |
Year Released | 1958 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5971 cc | 3350 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 215 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 1565 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2740 mm |