1958 Buick 40 vs. 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro
To start off, 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,971 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Buick 40 weights approximately 184 kg more than 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Buick 40 | 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro | |
| Make | Buick | Lotec |
| Model | 40 | Testa de Oro |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5971 cc | 4943 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 741 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 1656 kg |
