1958 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2000 Subaru Outback is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,971 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Buick 40 weights approximately 230 kg more than 2000 Subaru Outback.
Because 2000 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Buick 40 | 2000 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Buick | Subaru |
| Model | 40 | Outback |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5971 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 206 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 1610 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2530 mm |
