1958 Buick 40 vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,971 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Buick 40 weights approximately 305 kg more than 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Because 1958 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Buick 40 | 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Buick | Mitsubishi |
Model | 40 | Outlander |
Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5971 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 1535 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2670 mm |