1958 Buick 40 vs. 2010 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,971 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Buick 40 weights approximately 752 kg more than 2010 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1958 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Buick 40 | 2010 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Buick | Volkswagen |
Model | 40 | Polo |
Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5971 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 1088 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2470 mm |