1958 Buick 40 vs. 2011 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2011 Ford C-Max is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,971 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Buick 40 weights approximately 465 kg more than 2011 Ford C-Max.
Because 1958 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford C-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Buick 40 | 2011 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | C-Max |
Year Released | 1958 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5971 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 95 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 1375 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2648 mm |