1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 1949 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1958 Cadillac 62 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1949 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1949 Triumph Mayflower. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1245 kg more than 1949 Triumph Mayflower. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 1949 Triumph Mayflower | |
| Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
| Model | 62 | Mayflower |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5979 cc | 1247 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 3920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2110 mm |
