1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 1955 Talbot T 26
To start off, 1958 Cadillac 62 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Talbot T 26 (197 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 475 kg more than 1955 Talbot T 26.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 1955 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Talbot |
| Model | 62 | T 26 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1955 |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 4482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1890 mm |
