1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 1962 Fiat 2300
To start off, 1962 Fiat 2300 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1962 Fiat 2300. (104 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1962 Fiat 2300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 775 kg more than 1962 Fiat 2300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 1962 Fiat 2300 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | 62 | 2300 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 2279 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2660 mm |
