1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 1963 Cadillac Biarritz
To start off, 1963 Cadillac Biarritz is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac Biarritz (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 95 kg more than 1958 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 1963 Cadillac Biarritz | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | 62 | Biarritz |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 2180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3300 mm |
