1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 1964 Holden EH
To start off, 1964 Holden EH is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 910 kg more than 1964 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 1964 Holden EH | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | 62 | EH |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 2929 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2095 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2680 mm |
