1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 1964 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1964 Toyota Corona is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1964 Toyota Corona. (83 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1964 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1115 kg more than 1964 Toyota Corona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 1964 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Corona |
Year Released | 1958 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 1453 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2510 mm |