1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1255 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | 62 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5979 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 94 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2210 mm |
