1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 1969 Mini Clubman
To start off, 1969 Mini Clubman is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1969 Mini Clubman. (38 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1969 Mini Clubman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1405 kg more than 1969 Mini Clubman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 1969 Mini Clubman | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mini |
| Model | 62 | Clubman |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 3180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2040 mm |
