1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 1973 Steyr Haflinger
To start off, 1973 Steyr Haflinger is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1973 Steyr Haflinger. (27 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1973 Steyr Haflinger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1435 kg more than 1973 Steyr Haflinger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1973 Steyr Haflinger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Steyr Haflinger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 1973 Steyr Haflinger | |
| Make | Cadillac | Steyr |
| Model | 62 | Haflinger |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1973 |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 641 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 2860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 1510 mm |
