1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 1980 Holden Commodore
To start off, 1980 Holden Commodore is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1980 Holden Commodore. (111 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1980 Holden Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 935 kg more than 1980 Holden Commodore. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 1980 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | 62 | Commodore |
Year Released | 1958 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5979 cc | 3298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2670 mm |