1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 1982 Opel Manta
To start off, 1982 Opel Manta is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1982 Opel Manta. (110 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1982 Opel Manta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 995 kg more than 1982 Opel Manta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 1982 Opel Manta | |
| Make | Cadillac | Opel |
| Model | 62 | Manta |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 1979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 1090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2600 mm |
