1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 1983 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 1983 Toyota Cressida is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Cressida. (104 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Cressida. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1025 kg more than 1983 Toyota Cressida. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 1983 Toyota Cressida | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Cressida |
Year Released | 1958 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5979 cc | 1972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2650 mm |