1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 1983 Volvo 740
To start off, 1983 Volvo 740 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1983 Volvo 740. (129 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1983 Volvo 740. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 823 kg more than 1983 Volvo 740. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 1983 Volvo 740 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | 740 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 2319 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 2095 kg | 1272 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2780 mm |