1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 1986 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1986 Ford Falcon is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1986 Ford Falcon. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 725 kg more than 1986 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 1986 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 3273 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2095 kg | 1370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2840 mm |
