1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 1986 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 1986 Skoda Rapid R is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP) has 127 more horse power than 1986 Skoda Rapid R. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1986 Skoda Rapid R. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1245 kg more than 1986 Skoda Rapid R. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 1986 Skoda Rapid R | |
| Make | Cadillac | Skoda |
| Model | 62 | Rapid R |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 62 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2095 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2410 mm |
