1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 1988 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1988 Mercury Cougar is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 465 kg more than 1988 Mercury Cougar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 1988 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
Model | 62 | Cougar |
Year Released | 1958 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1860 mm |