1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1996 Jaguar XK is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 495 kg more than 1996 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | 62 | XK |
Year Released | 1958 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5979 cc | 3996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 290 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2600 mm |