1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Nissan Cima
To start off, 1997 Nissan Cima is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 555 kg more than 1997 Nissan Cima.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Nissan Cima | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | 62 | Cima |
Year Released | 1958 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1770 mm |