1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Honda S2000
To start off, 1998 Honda S2000 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Honda S2000 (251 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Honda S2000 should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 845 kg more than 1998 Honda S2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Honda S2000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Honda |
| Model | 62 | S2000 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 8300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 1240 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2410 mm |
