1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1998 Toyota Celica is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1998 Toyota Celica. (115 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1998 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1100 kg more than 1998 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | 62 | Celica |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5979 cc | 1762 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 1095 kg |
