1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Acura EL
To start off, 1999 Acura EL is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1999 Acura EL. (127 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1999 Acura EL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1016 kg more than 1999 Acura EL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 1999 Acura EL | |
| Make | Cadillac | Acura |
| Model | 62 | EL |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2095 kg | 1079 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4478 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2619 mm |
