1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 1999 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercedes-Benz ML (342 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 135 kg more than 1958 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 1999 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 62 | ML |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 5439 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 342 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 2095 kg | 2230 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2860 mm |
