1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 190 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 540 kg more than 2000 Toyota Celica.
Because 1958 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Celica |
Year Released | 1958 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 1545 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2600 mm |