1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2001 Ford Mustang is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 987 kg more than 2001 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5979 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 1208 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2580 mm |
