1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 825 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
| Model | 62 | Nea |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5979 cc | 2445 cc |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 1370 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2590 mm |
